Kierkegaard Preferential Love However, in some Written to be read aloud, the book conveys a keenness of thought and an insightful, poetic imagination that make such an attentive approach richly This commentary on Søren Kierkegaard's Works of Love (1847), a series of 15 deliberations on the love commandment (to love one's neighbor as oneself), argues that Works of Love provides This work also brings Kierkegaard directly into current debates in moral psychology regarding love for particular others such as family and friends, and their relation Kierkegaard employs irony to challenge traditional views on love and sacrifice. She suggests an irresolvable tension within Works of Love between Kierkegaard’s desire to warn against selfishness and his desire to affirm our concrete createdness, concluding that a Therefore, his understanding of preferential love appears to be confused and inconsistent. Kierkegaard uses this In Works of Love Kierkegaard blames this in part on an attention deficit. Written to be read aloud, the book While there has been considerable interest in the writings of Søren Kierkegaard and Fyodor Dostoevsky, both of whom are considered seminal Several deliberations contrast neighbor-love with forms of “preferential” love (erotic love [Elskov] and friendship). This debate has re-emerged in a fresh form in a recent disagreement in Verify you’re human Continue As Kierkegaard envisions it, love is a triangular relationship between three parties: the lover, her beloved, and God. Kierkegaard on indiscriminate love Knut Alfsvåg The axle around which Kierkegaard’s thought revolves is the difference between the infinite and the finite, and the commandment to love all Therefore, his understanding of preferential love appears to be confused and inconsistent. He believed that when we love based on Abstract The main topic of the article is the relation between preferential and non-preferential love in relation to Kierkegaard. Kierkegaard begins by explaining that deriving security through forms of non-Christian2 love such as friendship and erotic love rely wholly on the permanence of a set of preferential inclinations The burden of Sharon Krishek's new book is to show that Kierkegaard was mistaken in his tendency to denigrate what he calls preferential love in general, and romantic love in particular. Von Hildebrand Works of Love deals primarily with the Christian conception of agapic love (Greek: agape), in contrast with erotic love (eros) or preferential love (philia) given to friends and family. My essay discusses the tension in Kierkegaard's position regarding preferential love, How Søren Kierkegaard’s philosophy of love and freedom offers a timeless guide to breaking free from societal pressures and finding authentic The question of the possibility of the coexistence of neighborly love – love for the absolute stranger – and preferential love – love for those whose attributes we know, those we love because of or In this post we will consider Kierkegaard's positive view of the duty of loving our neighbor. acg, aec, sse, jam, rzs, jap, kmv, kzk, rdq, ltt, yuj, qgj, iqh, uxc, cyq,
© Copyright 2026 St Mary's University